From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 4 15:03:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA04D106568D for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 15:03:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joerg@britannica.bec.de) Received: from www.sonnenberger.org (www.sonnenberger.org [92.79.50.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8707B8FC19 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 15:03:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from britannica.bec.de (www.sonnenberger.org [192.168.1.10]) by www.sonnenberger.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F2E667F0 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 16:03:48 +0100 (CET) Received: by britannica.bec.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BAE9C15C70; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 16:03:30 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 16:03:30 +0100 From: Joerg Sonnenberger To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100304150330.GB29542@britannica.bec.de> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <20100219222604.44e50248.ray@ddteam.net> <20100220201510.720c62fd.ray@ddteam.net> <4B8E8E5A.5050203@freebsd.org> <20100304121705.b39ad5b5.ray@dlink.ua> <20100304142819.GC29681@britannica.bec.de> <20100304163831.e4e08fcc.ray@dlink.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100304163831.e4e08fcc.ray@dlink.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: GEOM_ULZMA X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:03:59 -0000 On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 04:38:31PM +0200, Alexandr Rybalko wrote: > On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 15:28:19 +0100 > Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > >> On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 12:17:05PM +0200, Alexandr Rybalko wrote: > >> > LZMA compression optimized for fast decompression. > >> > >> It is still measurable slower than gzip and it is certainly not free. > >> Most hard disks have linear read times >> 10 MB/s but the decompression > >> can easily need half a second even on a modern CPU. > > No one says that it fast, but if you have only 4M of flash for > CFE+kernel+rootfs+nvram, you must use something what make space > usage smaller. Different domain :) Joerg