Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 17:23:31 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> To: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fetch -b and -t flags Message-ID: <20001030172331.B349@ringworld.oblivion.bg> In-Reply-To: <20001030102023.D10767@puck.firepipe.net>; from will@physics.purdue.edu on Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 10:20:23AM -0500 References: <20001030164342.A349@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <20001030102023.D10767@puck.firepipe.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 10:20:23AM -0500, Will Andrews wrote: > On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 04:43:42PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > There are several ports in the tree which set FETCH_BEFOREARGS > > to something containing -b and/or -t. fetch(1) complains about > > obsolete/deprecated switches. > > They should remain as necessary for at least another year, because (I > _think_) 3.5-RELEASE shipped with -b and -t. (I.e., the automatic > detection of this was fixed with the removal of these options as having > any effect) Aye aye, just as I thought. Staying with local mods to the tree then. Thanks for the quick answer :) G'luck, Peter -- When you are not looking at it, this sentence is in Spanish. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001030172331.B349>