From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 18 14:37:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A48316A41F for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:37:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from francisco@natserv.net) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D4CE43D48 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:37:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from francisco@natserv.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.natserv.net [127.0.0.1]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0631A7E52; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 10:37:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 10:37:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: Tillman Hodgson In-Reply-To: <20051017203353.GF33270@seekingfire.com> Message-ID: <20051018103540.K28109@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <20051012234337.K63956@zoraida.natserv.net> <57416b300510142221r2c3da329o65d54cb0aa04fc73@mail.gmail.com> <20051015133148.P97899@zoraida.natserv.net> <18f601940510151547ka3573f8v2f0633010ad2874f@mail.gmail.com> <20051016010251.R90770@zoraida.natserv.net> <20051017203353.GF33270@seekingfire.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Distributed authentication. Which one? X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:37:55 -0000 On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Tillman Hodgson wrote: > It has some interoperability and security issues. They're solvable, IMO. Thanks for the feedback. I guess a good test is to ask.. what would you use? :-) > For example, most of the security concerns can be addressed with a > combination of transport-mode IPsec and Kerberos and I avoid inter- > operability issues by avoiding weird implementations of NIS ;-) Sounds like more trouble than it's worth. Right now I am leaning towards Kerberos or LDAP. Need to learn more about them to see their strengths and weaknesses and how it would fit into our existing extructure.