From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Apr  2 13:19:50 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA27213
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 2 Apr 1996 13:19:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA27203
          Tue, 2 Apr 1996 13:19:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id OAA17151; Tue, 2 Apr 1996 14:15:49 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199604022115.OAA17151@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: Linker sets & structures for networking code
To: phk@critter.tfs.com (Poul-Henning Kamp)
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 1996 14:15:49 -0700 (MST)
Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, FreeBSD-Current@FreeBSD.org, gpalmer@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <2946.828447790@critter.tfs.com> from "Poul-Henning Kamp" at Apr 2, 96 12:23:10 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> My conclusion was that it was an attempt to please the OSI powers that
> were, without completely wrecking the performance.
> 
> I could, for all I can see, be ripped out.

But then who would rip out the code?


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.