Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:33:26 -0700 From: Mark Foster <mark@foster.cc> To: Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports Request: OpenNMS Message-ID: <47FFA0E6.1060508@foster.cc> In-Reply-To: <0515FD4A165B9F35FA7E1B75@utd65257.utdallas.edu> References: <BCB185E6A8E1DF4BAD610F00CD32CE0D0253BB57@exchange1.tad.internal.tilera.com> <0515FD4A165B9F35FA7E1B75@utd65257.utdallas.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Paul Schmehl wrote: > If you're really serious that you want OpenNMS ported, then it's time > to make your contribution to FreeBSD. :-) Solicit help from other > FreeBSD users who use/want OpenNMS, and work together to distribute > the load and get the job done. There's plenty of people on this list > who can help you when you run into problems. > I couldn't agree more! But for the last statement. I have to say I've been underwhelmed with the amount of maintainership support I have received from this (ports@freebsd.org) list. Perhaps it's just me, I know the ports-mgr are also very busy. Or in other cases the answer is just unknown. So, as a maintainer I tend to ask google before bugging the list. Is a dedicated maintainer-support list something discussed before? -- Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints... Mark D. Foster, CISSP <mark@foster.cc> http://mark.foster.cc/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47FFA0E6.1060508>