From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Dec 26 13:16:40 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA04995
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 26 Dec 1997 13:16:40 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA04989
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 26 Dec 1997 13:16:36 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1])
          by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA00427;
          Fri, 26 Dec 1997 13:16:01 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com)
Message-Id: <199712262116.NAA00427@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96
To: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net>
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kernel threads api? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 26 Dec 1997 16:12:52 EST."
             <199712262112.QAA00665@dyson.iquest.net> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 1997 13:16:01 -0800
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Sounds good , estimated time for completion?

	Tnks,
	Amancio

> Amancio Hasty said:
> > 
> > 
> > Wondering if there is  enough kernel threads api to support something like
> > java 1.1.5.
> > 
> I am working the kernel side, and John Birrell is working the user side.  The
> java 1.1.5 is one of the targets.
> 
> -- 
> John                  | Never try to teach a pig to sing,
> dyson@freebsd.org     | it just makes you look stupid,
> jdyson@nc.com         | and it irritates the pig.