From owner-freebsd-isp  Mon May 24 12:43:19 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Received: from verdi.nethelp.no (verdi.nethelp.no [158.36.41.162])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A3BD14C49
	for <freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 24 May 1999 12:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no)
Received: (qmail 37670 invoked by uid 1001); 24 May 1999 19:43:15 +0000 (GMT)
To: mark@intrepid.net
Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: BIND and subnetted in-addr.arpa domains
From: sthaug@nethelp.no
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 24 May 1999 15:32:38 -0400"
References: <19990524153238.H20471@intrepid.net>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.05+ on Emacs 19.34.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 21:43:15 +0200
Message-ID: <37668.927574995@verdi.nethelp.no>
Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> > We have a dedicated access customer who wants to run reverse
> > DNS on the subnet that we're routing to him.  We're running BIND 4.9.X,
> > and I've looked though the BOG and man pages -- this doesn't seem
> > possible.
> 
> Thanks to everyone who responded.  Guess I'll go with the BIND 4 hack,
> although 8 *does* look a little more elegant...

But it's purely syntactic sugar. The final contents of the zone files
are the same, viewed from a secondary name server, for instance. So it's
just as much of a "hack" for BIND 8 as it is for BIND 4 :-)

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message