Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:52:24 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org> To: Jason <jhelfman@e-e.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make package for ports, general question Message-ID: <20100225095224.0547502a@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <20100225052506.GA987@Jason-Helfmans-MacBook-Pro.local> References: <20100225052506.GA987@Jason-Helfmans-MacBook-Pro.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/_sZi=v=L+p=OgowtjYnb1Hh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:25:06 -0800 Jason <jhelfman@e-e.com> wrote: [ .. ] > That being said, I ran into an item today that had me perplexed. >=20 > Basically, it comes down to this: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/pkg-install.html >=20 > Why is it that "make package" doesn't include the execution > instructions noted in the Makefile. To me, with my new knowledge of > the ports system, seems like double the work for development and > maintaining a port and package. I'm not just speaking for someone > that maintains internal ports, but the many developers that maintain > ports in the official ports tree for FreeBSD. [ .. ] What exactly doesn't work for you? Are you talking about pkg-message? --=20 IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B --Sig_/_sZi=v=L+p=OgowtjYnb1Hh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkuGLDgACgkQJ7GIuiH/oeWtMwCfQAeKooRoEX3ioaCvgD/1Gyxp DSUAoI+xNua5QgbackBXg5bNDKPtnAgF =G+su -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/_sZi=v=L+p=OgowtjYnb1Hh--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100225095224.0547502a>