From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Nov 1 13: 1: 9 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.attica.net.nz (mail.attica.net.nz [202.180.64.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F26EE37B4C5 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 13:01:02 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 23182 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2000 21:01:00 -0000 Received: from 202-180-75-63.nas2.wn1.attica.net.nz (HELO davep200.afterswish.com) (202.180.75.63) by mail.attica.net.nz with SMTP; 1 Nov 2000 21:01:00 -0000 Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.1.20001102095240.00a3a440@mail.afterswish.com> X-Sender: davep@mail.afterswish.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2000 09:57:03 +1300 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org From: David Preece Subject: Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft survey In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Possibly off topic, possibly not. Am I the only one who doesn't really care about uptimes? It would be far more productive to get a top 100 (or whatever) of availability... More interesting would be to test availability based on some dynamic content, a given request with an expected outcome a la F5? I may be forced to hack this together, where's my damn cable modem!!! Dave :) BTW, we didn't fare very well at all in the top *average* uptimes. Sun, OTOH, did. Bugger. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message