From owner-cvs-share  Thu May  1 10:16:53 1997
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-share>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA03612
          for cvs-share-outgoing; Thu, 1 May 1997 10:16:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [194.198.43.36])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA03564;
          Thu, 1 May 1997 10:16:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.7.6/8.7.3) id TAA23325; Thu, 1 May 1997 19:15:44 +0200 (MET DST)
Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 19:15:44 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <199705011715.TAA23325@bitbox.follo.net>
From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@bitbox.follo.net>
To: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
CC: bde@freefall.FreeBSD.ORG, CVS-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org,
        cvs-share@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu's message of Wed, 30 Apr 1997
	20:54:02 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: cvs commit:  src/share/mk bsd.info.mk
References: <199704301703.KAA06237@freefall.freebsd.org>
	<199705010354.UAA21007@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
Sender: owner-cvs-share@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
>  * Received: (from root@localhost)
>  *           by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA04859;
>  *           Wed, 30 Apr 1997 20:37:01 -0700 (PDT)
>  * Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3])
>  *           by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA04830;
>  *           Wed, 30 Apr 1997 20:36:49 -0700 (PDT)
>  * Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.cdrom.com [204.216.27.21])
>  *           by who.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.11) with ESMTP id KAA06085
>  *           ; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 10:03:14 -0700 (PDT)
>  * From: bde@freefall.FreeBSD.ORG
>  * Received: (from bde@localhost)
>  * 	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA06237;
>  * 	Wed, 30 Apr 1997 10:03:10 -0700 (PDT)
>  * Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 10:03:10 -0700 (PDT)
> 
> Is it just me, or is the mail delivery very slow since the transition
> to freefall/hub?  Is hub overloaded?

If you look at the headers, it seems like who.cdrom.com has been
completely overloaded; hub sent it on 12 seconds after receiving it.
I've had vast speedups after the separation of hub and freefall; 5
minutes instead of several hours for delivery of the mailing lists.

Eivind.