From owner-freebsd-gnome  Wed Oct  2  9:12:51 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5DA5537B401; Wed,  2 Oct 2002 09:12:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout11.sul.t-online.com (mailout11.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.85])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E155443E42; Wed,  2 Oct 2002 09:12:49 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from 520023893678-0001@t-online.de)
Received: from fwd08.sul.t-online.de 
	by mailout11.sul.t-online.com with smtp 
	id 17wm7D-0004Dl-07; Wed, 02 Oct 2002 18:12:47 +0200
Received: from pD9017209.dip.t-dialin.net (520023893678-0001@[217.1.114.9]) by fwd08.sul.t-online.com
	with esmtp id 17wm7B-0xQlMGC; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 18:12:45 +0200
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 19:13:25 +0000 (GMT)
From: 520023893678-0001@t-online.de (Peter Ulrich Kruppa)
To: Marc Recht <marc@informatik.uni-bremen.de>
Cc: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	<freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: GNOME 2.1 upgrade
In-Reply-To: <20021002100802.58265995.marc@informatik.uni-bremen.de>
Message-ID: <20021002190828.B19345-100000@small.pukruppa.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Sender: 520023893678-0001@t-dialin.net
Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-gnome.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-gnome>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-gnome>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Marc Recht wrote:

> > What do people think of upgrading the GNOME 2 components to the
> > just-released GNOME 2.1 versions?  This is the development version that
> > will become GNOME 2.2.  This will involve updating components such as
> > pango and gtk2.  This may not be acceptable.
> >
> > Another alternative is to create -devel versions of the 2.1 components.
> > Of course, this will create pains when upgrading.  It should be noted
> > that the 2.1 and upcoming 2.2 components will be _source and binary_
> > compatible with the 2.0 components.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> Gnome2 is far from being stable.
Sic! If you need something stable you have to use gnome"1"
anyway. So - Joe - give us the real thing. I will continue to get
on everybody's nerves with stupid questions :-)

Regards,

Uli.



> For example look at gconf-editor. Gtk+2 and frieds (pango, atk,
> glib) are the only exceptions. So, why not go with gtk2-devel
> and replacing the rest, hoping that Gnome 2.2 stabelizes.
>
> Just my 0.02 EUR..
>
> Marc
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message
>

*-----------------------------------*
*        Peter Ulrich Kruppa        *
*          -  Wuppertal -           *
*              Germany              *
*-----------------------------------*



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message