Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 09:12:30 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: A G F Keahan <ak@freenet.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Optimal UFS parameters Message-ID: <58936.976176750@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 07 Dec 2000 05:52:31 %2B0200." <3A2F097F.15D592DD@freenet.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <3A2F097F.15D592DD@freenet.co.uk>, A G F Keahan writes: >What parameters should I choose for a large (say, 60 or 80Gb) >filesystem? I remember a while ago someone (phk?) conducted a survey, >but nothing seems to have come of it. In the meantime, the capacity of >an average hard drive has increased tenfold, and the defaults have >become even less reasonable. > >What's the current consensus of opinion? > >newfs -b ????? -f ????? -c ????? Right now I tend to use: -b 16384 -f 4096 -c 159 -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?58936.976176750>