From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 15 00:22:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CFB0195 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 00:22:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD782968 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 00:22:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 9E5D133C25; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 19:22:41 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: "Howard Leadmon" Subject: Re: Updating from 9.2 to 10.0-BETA3 Issues.. References: <044201cee0ee$c0bc0970$42341c50$@leadmon.net> <528475B6.5010604@i nfracaninophile.co.uk> <046501cee10b$3d6da9d0$b848fd70$@leadmon.net> <5284912 C.4040203@infracaninophile.co.uk> <047401cee145$fafde7a0$f0f9b6e0$@leadmon.net> <44zjp7vwma.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <047f01cee14d$4a3a7700$deaf6500$@leadmon.net> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 19:22:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: <047f01cee14d$4a3a7700$deaf6500$@leadmon.net> (Howard Leadmon's message of "Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:22:11 -0500") Message-ID: <44li0qwm26.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 00:22:43 -0000 Please don't top-post. "Howard Leadmon" writes: > I did rebuild all my ports using portupgrade with the -afr option to make > sure it did everything, and it said it did, but after that I show stuff like > subversion that was rebuilt still using the FBSD 9.x libs. Do I have to > set something that will make it use the 10.x stuff? > Based on those symptoms, my strong suspicion is that subversion was not, in fact, updated.