From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jul 10 8:16:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from softweyr.com (softweyr.com [208.247.99.111]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49A0F37B406 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 08:16:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from zaphod ([204.68.178.35] helo=softweyr.com ident=16cbea175edf1316610dc3e24419d83f) by softweyr.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 15JzJx-000FGU-00; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 09:21:05 -0600 Message-ID: <3B4B1BB2.57ED1B00@softweyr.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 09:13:54 -0600 From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr LLC X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Laurence Berland Cc: Rasputin , Jamie Bowden , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Mall now BSDCentral References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Laurence Berland wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Rasputin wrote: > > > I may be low on caffeine, but I don't see how breaking up the base system > > into packages makes it any easier to upgrade than using cvsup? > > I think the discussion is Re: binary upgrades, like putting in the CD and > hitting that upgrade option, which right now doesn't quite get you there > afaik. I don't think the goal was to make the system easier to upgrade, but rather easier to subset. Do we really NEED to have sendmail on every DNS server we put together? -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC wes@softweyr.com http://softweyr.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message