From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 25 19:55:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 534A616A4D0; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:55:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mp2.macomnet.net (mp2.macomnet.net [195.128.64.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 872D743D41; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:55:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru) Received-SPF: pass (mp2.macomnet.net: domain of maxim@macomnet.ru designates 127.0.0.1 as permitted sender) receiver=mp2.macomnet.net; client_ip=127.0.0.1; envelope-from=maxim@macomnet.ru; Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mp2.macomnet.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j0PJsqhf012002; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:54:53 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru) Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:54:52 +0300 (MSK) From: Maxim Konovalov To: Julian Elischer In-Reply-To: <41F5894A.9080500@elischer.org> Message-ID: <20050125225021.F11677@mp2.macomnet.net> References: <200501242327.j0ONRTet050069@ambrisko.com> <41F5894A.9080500@elischer.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SpamTest-Info: Profile: Formal (201/050124) X-SpamTest-Info: Profile: Detect Hard (4/030526) X-SpamTest-Info: Profile: SysLog X-SpamTest-Info: Profile: Marking - Keywords (2/030321) X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 2.0.0 [0124], SpamtestISP/Release cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: Dmitry Morozovsky cc: re@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd problem: Cannot detect Hard Disk (SATA) RELENG_4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:55:06 -0000 On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, 15:48-0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > Doug Ambrisko wrote: > > > Julian Elischer writes: > > | Doug, could you comit your patchsets to RELENG_4? > > > > I could but have not been given an okay from RE. > > Theoreticallty you do not need RE's permission at the moment. > (though it would be nice) First, let -stable people test the patch. Heads-up in -stable is our usual practise. -- Maxim Konovalov