From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 7 14:37:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C7516A438; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 14:37:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net [66.23.211.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84EFC43D5D; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 14:37:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (john@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k27Eb3ES026163; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 09:37:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 09:17:47 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <60ffc71f0603060759r34f02878ha38a7a275dc0aa6c@mail.gmail.com> <60ffc71f0603061637j27ebe520r329e88bbc3141746@mail.gmail.com> <20060307012605.C79905@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20060307012605.C79905@fledge.watson.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200603070917.51495.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1317/Tue Mar 7 01:06:47 2006 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on server.baldwin.cx Cc: Yar Tikhiy , Robert Watson , current@freebsd.org, Nik Subject: Re: multicast group memberships exceeded in FreeBSD 6-Prerelease X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 14:37:31 -0000 On Monday 06 March 2006 20:26, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Nik wrote: > > > Thanks bro. Really appreciate that, I'll give a try after this then I'll let > > you know the result. > > We might want to consider increasing the maximum to a larger number, given > that 20 does sound a bit small these days. At least make it into a real kernel option so that people can keep the custom setting in their kernel config w/o having to maintain local patches. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org