Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 08:59:09 +0200 From: Martin Nilsson <martin@gneto.com> To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, John Marshall <John.Marshall@riverwillow.com.au> Subject: Re: Watchdog Timeout - bge devices Message-ID: <45235BBD.4030105@gneto.com> In-Reply-To: <45234418.7000205@samsco.org> References: <9F7B653A50CF3D45A92C05401046239B0E0C27@rwsrv06.rw2.riverwillow.net.au> <45234418.7000205@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Scott Long skrev: > In any case, SCHED_ULE is still considered to be highly experimental. > Hopefully it will get some more attention in the near future to > bring it closer to production quality. Can we have a commit (at least to STABLE) that adds a big fat message during boot that goes something like: ### >>>> You are using SCHED_ULE scheduler <<<< ### ### SCHED_ULE is still considered to be highly experimental ### ### Please revert to SCHED_4BSD before reporting problems. ### ### (Unless of course you are reporting a ULE scheduler bug) ### So we don't waste time analyzing errors that are caused by ULE. The /. crowd seems to think that because ULE is newer than 4BSD it is somehow magically better and more bug free :-) Having said that I see the em timeouts both with ULE and 4BSD. /Martin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45235BBD.4030105>