From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 16 14:05:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E9616A4CE for ; Mon, 16 May 2005 14:05:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9748F43DDC for ; Mon, 16 May 2005 14:05:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com (frontend2.internal [10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96006C90416 for ; Mon, 16 May 2005 10:05:47 -0400 (EDT) X-Sasl-enc: jveCc8VTFkpeYI9om061IhTmOEPiLOZcsjlsb96XI1VA 1116252345 Received: from gumby.localhost (dsl-80-41-79-106.access.as9105.com [80.41.79.106]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F2D570326 for ; Mon, 16 May 2005 10:05:40 -0400 (EDT) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 15:04:54 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <20050513233758.53228.qmail@web31804.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050513233758.53228.qmail@web31804.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200505161504.54711.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: bittorrent client X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 14:05:58 -0000 On Saturday 14 May 2005 00:37, Paulo Roberto wrote: > Hello, > > Any suggestions? I have been using ctorrent, but I am getting a lot of I use Azureus, it's full of features, but it uses a lot resources. Bittorrent is probably the next best port, and is much lighter. > files it shows that it has downloaded 100%, but if I start it again (to > seed) it was fully completed. I don't see what you are getting at here, aren't "100%" and "fully" the same thing.