From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 6 10:37:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D53716A4CE for ; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 10:37:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhub1.midco.net (mailhub1.midco.net [24.220.0.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C5343D3F for ; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 10:37:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pmes@bis.midco.net) Received: (qmail 22658 invoked by uid 0); 6 Mar 2004 18:37:30 -0000 Received: from host-195-219-220-24.midco.net (HELO bis.midco.net) ([24.220.219.195]) (envelope-sender ) by lvs-pop.midco.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 6 Mar 2004 18:37:30 -0000 Message-ID: <404A1A69.9060207@bis.midco.net> Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2004 12:37:29 -0600 From: Peter Schultz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7a) Gecko/20040227 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Usability Of NOCLEAN X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2004 18:37:31 -0000 Hi, I'm just curious about the usability of NOCLEAN. If I've just updated world and things are fine with the installation, is it considered safe to use NOCLEAN? A couple updates to libc came in this morning just after I installed a fresh world and I'm wondering what others do in cases like this. Thanks, Pete...