From owner-freebsd-emulation Thu Dec 10 16:21:04 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA15593 for freebsd-emulation-outgoing; Thu, 10 Dec 1998 16:21:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zed.ludd.luth.se (zed.ludd.luth.se [130.240.16.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA15588 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 1998 16:21:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gozer@ludd.luth.se) Received: from speedy.ludd.luth.se (speedy.ludd.luth.se [130.240.16.164]) by zed.ludd.luth.se (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA08110; Fri, 11 Dec 1998 01:20:47 +0100 Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 01:20:47 +0100 (CET) From: Johan Larsson To: "Richard Seaman, Jr." cc: "emulation@freebsd.org" , "Vladimir N. Silyaev" Subject: Re: StarOffice 5.0 (was Re: linux threads binary) In-Reply-To: <199812102336.RAA28229@ns.tar.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 10 Dec 1998, Richard Seaman, Jr. wrote: > On Wed, 9 Dec 1998 22:20:48 +0100 (CET), Johan Larsson wrote: > > >> I can now also get StarOffice 5.0 to execute its setup program > >> without dumping core (though the core dump that occured in setup > >> did not appear to be a threads problem, but rather a linxu_pipe > >> problem). However, it reports that I'm missing libvos505li.so. > > > >That file is installed in the Office50 catalogue. So it should be in the > >staroffice installation :) > > > >> I'll have to track down a copy of that lib before I can test this > >> further. > > > >>From a linuxmachine with SO5 installed: > > > >/usr/local/Office50/lib/libvos505li.so > > Ok. I found it. I needed to do a little more manipulation of the > LD_CONFIG_PATH in ways not found in the SO docs. I've now managed > to get through setup and have so50 running. Its only been running > for about 30 minutes, but I can confirm its running multiple threads, > and there are no apparent problems so far. This sounds more than great!!! :-) Did you have to do some tweaks with /proc? Patches are where? ;-) Johan -- * mailto:gozer@ludd.luth.se * http://www.ludd.luth.se/users/gozer/ * * Powered by FreeBSD. http://www.se.freebsd.org/ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ * To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message