From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 27 20:42:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC90116A41F for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 20:42:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhs@flat.berklix.net) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA6B43D55 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 20:42:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhs@flat.berklix.net) Received: from js.berklix.net (p549A7E49.dip.t-dialin.net [84.154.126.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j8RKfxxr042093; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:42:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@flat.berklix.net) Received: from fire.jhs.private (fire.jhs.private [192.168.91.41]) by js.berklix.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j8RKftw8004631; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:41:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@flat.berklix.net) Received: from fire.jhs.private (localhost.jhs.private [127.0.0.1]) by fire.jhs.private (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j8RKg4JV022691; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:42:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@fire.jhs.private) Message-Id: <200509272042.j8RKg4JV022691@fire.jhs.private> To: Kris Kennaway , Rene Ladan In-Reply-To: Message from Kris Kennaway of "Tue, 27 Sep 2005 10:48:51 EDT." <20050927144851.GA12766@xor.obsecurity.org> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:42:04 +0200 From: "Julian H. Stacey" Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Negative disc usage from /bin/df 6.0-BETA5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 20:42:03 -0000 -------- Kris Kennaway wrote: (& similar private mail from Rene L. thanks to both) > On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 01:21:50PM +0200, Julian Stacey wrote: > > 6.0-BETA5 /bin/df > > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > > /dev/ad0s4a 253678 91884 141500 39% / > > devfs 1 1 0 100% /dev > > /dev/ad0s4d 253678 141418 91966 61% /var > > /dev/ad0s4e 253678 -272 233656 -0% /tmp > > /dev/ad0s4f 5421722 3255960 1732026 65% /usr > >=20 > > 108% is plausible when eg root has eaten most of the reserve allowed by= > =20 > > eg 'newfs -m 10', but ... Negative disc usage just doesnt look right ! > > umount and fsck..you probably have some fs corruption. Yes, thanks, FREE BLK COUNT(S) WRONG IN SUPERBLK SALVAGE? yes First I was just so amused to see negative space used (& had wondered about ratio of int to unsigned usage in the FS etc). -- Julian Stacey. Consultant Unix Net & Sys. Eng., Munich. http://berklix.com Mail Ascii not HTML. Ihr Rauch = meine allergischen Kopfschmerzen.