From owner-freebsd-advocacy Thu Dec 20 14:55:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mail5.speakeasy.net (mail5.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.205]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2266F37B420 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 14:55:45 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 27733 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2001 22:55:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO laptop.baldwin.cx) ([64.81.54.73]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 20 Dec 2001 22:55:44 -0000 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 14:55:26 -0800 (PST) From: John Baldwin To: John Baldwin Subject: Re: Microsoft Advocacy? Cc: advocacy@FreeBSD.org, Gilbert Gong , Jeremiah Gowdy , Anthony Atkielski Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 20-Dec-01 John Baldwin wrote: > Err, this is not valid. There aren't 4 statements there are two: > > (1) For a specific instance, (2) FreeBSD is valid as a desktop. Actually, it would be better written as so: Someone belives that there exists some specific circumstance such that FreeBSD is a valid desktop. The opposite of this statement (as should be evident from basic Math proof courses) is: For all specific circumstances, FreeBSD is not a valid desktop. This, then, is what Jeremiah "believes". -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message