From owner-freebsd-current Wed Dec 29 6: 5:18 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 758) id 8B68114BC4; Wed, 29 Dec 1999 06:05:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AD8D1CD821; Wed, 29 Dec 1999 06:05:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@hub.freebsd.org) Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 06:05:17 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Kennaway To: Emre Cc: Wilko Bulte , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW In-Reply-To: <19991227170258.A25978@iris.vsrc.uab.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 27 Dec 1999, Emre wrote: > Not really. All my other boxes (NetBSD/OpenBSD) run -current so I'm > used to be on the "bleeding edge" I figured it would be enabled > by default, since FreeBSD promises to be _the_ Server O/S. Please see http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/cutting-edge.html#CURRENT This question was really freebsd-questions material and not the kind of thing which is appropriate for freebsd-current. If you're running FreeBSD-CURRENT you're expected to be familiar with the technicalities of FreeBSD (i.e. not just NetBSD/OpenBSD), which I'm not sure that you are, yet. It's not (just) about the danger to your own system, it's the hand-holding load on the developers when a FreeBSD neophyte thinks he's ready to run the developer's version :-( Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message