From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Mar 9 20:01:13 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA28484 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Mon, 9 Mar 1998 20:01:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gluck.coda.cs.cmu.edu (GLUCK.CODA.CS.CMU.EDU [128.2.242.61]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA28401 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 1998 20:00:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rvb@gluck.coda.cs.cmu.edu) Received: (from rvb@localhost) by gluck.coda.cs.cmu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA09331; Mon, 9 Mar 1998 23:05:33 -0500 (EST) To: Marc Slemko Cc: Chris Csanady , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kernel wishlist for web server performance References: From: rvb@gluck.coda.cs.cmu.edu (Robert V. Baron) Date: 09 Mar 1998 23:05:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: Marc Slemko's message of Sun, 8 Mar 1998 13:30:25 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: Lines: 7 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.46/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Marc Slemko writes: What I don't understand in using SendFile and avoiding the copy to mbuf's is where does TCP fit in. We are using tcpip for the web. When I send a packet, I will eventually, get an acknowledge or I won't. I may have to resend a "packet" I sent earlier. Who worries about this detail, SendFile or the TCP implementation? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message