From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Oct 22 19:32:55 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA24059
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 22 Oct 1996 19:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA24054
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 22 Oct 1996 19:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.6/8.6.9) with ESMTP id TAA06804; Tue, 22 Oct 1996 19:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
To: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: [Fwd: another patch for comment] 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 22 Oct 1996 18:59:37 PDT."
             <326D7C09.794BDF32@whistle.com> 
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 1996 19:32:49 -0700
Message-ID: <6802.846037969@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> here's another patch I'd like to add.
> 
> hopefully I can also eventually add a '/stand/selftest'

I think this is starting to get a little silly, all these "fall back"
paths to invoke as init.  Rather than add another, for a total of 5
init possibilities now, wouldn't a more general mechanism be
warranted?  Otherwise, I see no reason why you couldn't just keep this
on your own branch - it doesn't look like something of truly general
utility.

						Jordan