Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 22:15:12 +1200 From: "Juha Saarinen" <juha@saarinen.org> To: "Kris Kennaway" <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: "Jordan Hubbard" <jkh@osd.bsdi.com>, <dmmiller@cvzoom.net>, <msmith@FreeBSD.ORG>, <nuno.mailinglists@pt-quorum.com>, <guilherme@nortenet.pt>, <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: CFLAGS Optimization Message-ID: <KPECIILENDDLPCNIMLOFGENOCDAA.juha@saarinen.org> In-Reply-To: <20010508031001.A91590@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:: It's well documented in /etc/defaults/make.conf :: :: # CFLAGS controls the compiler settings used when compiling C code. :: # Note that optimization settings above -O (-O2, ...) are not recommended :: # or supported for compiling the world or the kernel - please revert any :: # nonstandard optimization settings to "-O" before submitting bug reports :: # to the developers. :: # Note also that at this time the -O2 setting is known to produce BROKEN :: # CODE on the Alpha platform. This is "well documented"? It doesn't say *why* optflags above -O are bad. -- Juha To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?KPECIILENDDLPCNIMLOFGENOCDAA.juha>