From owner-freebsd-arch  Fri Dec  1 17:57:11 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E5C6437B400; Fri,  1 Dec 2000 17:57:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30])
	by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA25666;
	Fri, 1 Dec 2000 20:57:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from gallatin@localhost)
	by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.11.1/8.9.1) id eB21v1Y06449;
	Fri, 1 Dec 2000 20:57:01 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu)
From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri,  1 Dec 2000 20:57:00 -0500 (EST)
To: dg@root.com
Cc: Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@technokratis.com>,
	"Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@kdm.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG,
	alfred@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: zero copy code review 
In-Reply-To: <200012012326.PAA14154@implode.root.com>
References: <14888.9802.415926.434956@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
	<200012012326.PAA14154@implode.root.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs  Lucid
Message-ID: <14888.22179.833528.247128@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


David Greenman writes:
 >    Oops. The original assumption (and code that I wrote) was that M_WAIT
 > _cannot_ return a NULL pointer. This was changed in FreeBSD recently, and

Yes, that's always been my assumption too.  That's why I never noticed
it...

Drew


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message