From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 17 23:17:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06261065788 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:17:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA4A8FC18 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:17:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id BAA16394; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 01:17:52 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1RnIHo-0005m2-9r; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 01:17:52 +0200 Message-ID: <4F16019F.2060300@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 01:17:51 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Lepore References: <4F15C44F.1030208@freebsd.org> <1326836797.1669.234.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> In-Reply-To: <1326836797.1669.234.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-U Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD has serious problems with focus, longevity, and lifecycle X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:17:59 -0000 on 17/01/2012 23:46 Ian Lepore said the following: > Now, before we're even really completely up and running on 8.2 at work, > 9.0 hits the street, and developers have moved on to working in the 10.0 > world. What are the chances that any of the patches I've submitted for > bugs we fixed in 8.x are ever going to get commited now that 8 is well > on its way to becoming ancient history in developers' minds? My opinion is that this will have more to do with your approach to pushing the patches (and your persistence) rather than with anything else. As long as stable/8 is still a supported branch or the bugs are reproducible in any of the supported branches. -- Andriy Gapon