From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 06:03:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 373FE16A41B for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 06:03:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: from relay00.pair.com (relay00.pair.com [209.68.5.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BB85D13C44B for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 06:02:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: (qmail 57597 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2008 06:02:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 26 Jan 2008 06:02:58 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.2.70 Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:02:57 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Silbersack To: Andre Oppermann In-Reply-To: <479A7B55.6050302@freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20080126000209.H3599@odysseus.silby.com> References: <200711200656.lAK6u4bc021279@repoman.freebsd.org> <4797B77E.2090605@freebsd.org> <20080124005006.D93697@odysseus.silby.com> <47986F27.10401@freebsd.org> <20080124145713.K15031@mp2.macomnet.net> <47988A2A.5010506@freebsd.org> <20080124164704.X15031@mp2.macomnet.net> <47989E3C.4030700@freebsd.org> <20080124171957.N15031@mp2.macomnet.net> <20080125073623.F15031@mp2.macomnet.net> <479A7B55.6050302@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet tcp_syncache.c X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 06:03:00 -0000 On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Andre Oppermann wrote: > Maxim Konovalov wrote: >> http://maxim.int.ru/stuff/adsl.dmp.gz >> >> 192.168.1.1 -- adsl box >> 192.168.1.250 -- FreeBSD > > The trace looks perfectly fine with regard to timestamps. They are sent > and properly reflected by the adsl box. Everything else looks fine too. > No anomalies seen. Er, I think we may be getting the two timestamp issues crossed, wasn't Maxim the one running into the problem where the large window scale sizes were causing trouble? -Mike