From owner-freebsd-current Fri Apr 23 9:23:21 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DB9B14D80; Fri, 23 Apr 1999 09:23:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN) id BAA01082; Sat, 24 Apr 1999 01:20:35 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <3720973B.B24B2FEE@newsguy.com> Date: Sat, 24 Apr 1999 00:52:27 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dom Mitchell Cc: adrian@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: nice little kernel task for somebody References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dom Mitchell wrote: > > As for making ps totally proc aware, I'm not totally sure that's the way > to go. I shall have to have a look through the archives though; I've a > feeling that this has been discussed before... DCS, The Archive Man, comes to your help. If you make ps procfs dependent, you won't be able to use it on core dumps. That's different from making procfs complete enough to support a ps. Against that there is a general Linuxism/Kitchen-Sink feeling. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "Well, Windows works, using a loose definition of 'works'..." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message