From owner-cvs-ports Sun Nov 10 02:57:41 1996 Return-Path: owner-cvs-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id CAA29990 for cvs-ports-outgoing; Sun, 10 Nov 1996 02:57:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfw-ix10.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix10.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id CAA29982; Sun, 10 Nov 1996 02:57:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from baloon.mimi.com (sjx-ca83-03.ix.netcom.com [207.94.112.99]) by dfw-ix10.ix.netcom.com (8.6.13/8.6.12) with ESMTP id CAA27613; Sun, 10 Nov 1996 02:57:04 -0800 Received: (from asami@localhost) by baloon.mimi.com (8.8.2/8.6.12) id CAA01262; Sun, 10 Nov 1996 02:57:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 10 Nov 1996 02:57:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199611101057.CAA01262@baloon.mimi.com> To: jmz@freefall.freebsd.org CC: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org In-reply-to: <199611100305.TAA07197@freefall.freebsd.org> (message from Jean-Marc Zucconi on Sat, 9 Nov 1996 19:05:42 -0800 (PST)) Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11/XFree86/patches patch-aa ports/x11/XFree86/scripts configure From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * Added: x11/XFree86/patches patch-aa * Log: * Link dynamically with libtcl from /usr/lib if XF86Setup is compiled. Cool cool. * Modified: x11/XFree86/scripts configure * Log: * Try to detect if tk4.x is present in /usr/local so that XF86Setup can * be compiled. This looks fine, except libtk version 4.1 is called "libtk41.so.*", not "libtk4.1.so.*". ;) (Ousterhout changed the naming convention between 4.0 and 4.1.) I think we shouldn't go out of our way to try to support many versions at once (it's not going to work anyway). There is only one tk in the FreeBSD ports tree (tk-3.6 and 4.0 are going to be deleted soon), I think we should just make it assume it's tk-4.1 or else. If this was any other port, I'd be yelling LIB_DEPENDS but since (1) this has NO_PACKAGE set, and (2) there's going to be a major chicken and egg problem if the user starts on a fresh system by building this port ;), so I won't go that far. Satoshi