From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Mar 22 10:09:27 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA01331 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Sun, 22 Mar 1998 10:09:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from horst.bfd.com (horst.bfd.com [204.160.242.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA01310 for ; Sun, 22 Mar 1998 10:09:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ejs@bfd.com) Received: from harlie.bfd.com (bastion.bfd.com [204.160.242.14]) by horst.bfd.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA16696; Sun, 22 Mar 1998 10:09:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ejs@bfd.com) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 1998 10:09:11 -0800 (PST) From: "Eric J. Schwertfeger" To: James Raynard cc: "Tim O'Neil" , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: freebsd-hackers-digest V4 #75 In-Reply-To: <19980322111844.39246@jraynard.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 22 Mar 1998, James Raynard wrote: > On Sat, Mar 21, 1998 at 06:33:29PM -0800, Tim O'Neil wrote: > > > > Well, I replied with instructions and a full quote > > of his letter. > > Careful - I've seen a lot of spam originating from earthlink.net, > so this could well be an address-gathering exercise. Don't you think it would be easier for the spammer to just subscribe his address-gathering robot to the list? And while I have seen a lot of spam from earthlink as well, effective procmail filters get rid of almost all of it (95% in my experience, and I've made some improvements that seem to have taken that up to 98-99%). To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message