Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 12:44:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Shell Hung <shell@shellhung.org> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/29681: bsd.port.mk cannot handle some module's PREFIX Message-ID: <200108131944.f7DJiNt57141@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 29681
>Category: ports
>Synopsis: bsd.port.mk cannot handle some module's PREFIX
>Confidential: no
>Severity: critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: freebsd-ports
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: change-request
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Mon Aug 13 12:50:00 PDT 2001
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Shell Hung
>Release: 4.3-current
>Organization:
>Environment:
FreeBSD testing 4.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.3-RELEASE #0: Sat Apr 21 10:54:49 GMT 2001 jkh@narf.osd.bsdi.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/GENERIC i386
>Description:
By default, when bsd.port.mk configurating Makefile.PL only pass
PREFIX as argument, but some Perl module (eg. Test-Harness) needed
INSTALLPRIVLIB and/or INSTALLARCHLIB in order to install, otherwise
default installation will goes to /usr/lib and not ${PREFIX}/lib,
in some case, adding these tag to CONFIGURE_ARGS is not bad.
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
I simple did a patch :
http://www.shellhung.org/FreeBSD/patches/bsd.port.mk.patch
Could someone look at this patch ? Thank you.
I tested with this patch with some ports, it shouldn't effect
other ports since it inside PERL_CONFIGURE, even existing
Perl ports.. :-)
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200108131944.f7DJiNt57141>