From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 15 05:28:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F8737B401 for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 05:28:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gravy.homeunix.net (pool-151-197-188-218.phil.east.verizon.net [151.197.188.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8801B43FBF for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 05:28:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bryan@gravy.homeunix.net) Received: from gravy.homeunix.net (gravy.homeunix.net [192.168.1.2]) by gravy.homeunix.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3FCSgVw000648 for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 08:28:42 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bryan@gravy.homeunix.net) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 08:28:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Bryan Liesner To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030415080609.G621@gravy.homeunix.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: new usb2 stuff X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 12:28:44 -0000 Unless I compile in ohci along with ehci, I get the following error: gravy kernel: usb0: wrong number of companions (2 != 0) Using both ohci and ehci results in probing the attached devices twice, then removing the ohci device in favor of the ehci device. So, in the dmesg, I see my usb hard drive twice, assigning umass0, then umass1. After umass1 is assigned, umass0 is then detached. kernel: umass0: Buslink USB 2.0 Hard Drive, rev 2.00/11.00, addr 2 kernel: umass1: Buslink USB 2.0 Hard Drive, rev 2.00/11.00, addr 2 kernel: umass0: at uhub2 port 4 (addr 2) disconnected kernel: umass0: detached Is this the intended behavior? I've been using a partitioned off usb hard drive as a tape device, just using the raw devices as tapes. (Much cheaper than a tape drive). My nightly dump caused a panic, although shorter transfers seem ok. I found this in messages: kernel: umass1: Invalid CSW: sig 0x00010001 should be 0x53425355 Sorry I don't have more info at this time, I've been flooded at work and haven't had the time to reproduce and create a core dump yet. Finally, I see no difference in speed between the 1.0 drivers and the 2.0 drivers. -- ============================================================= = Bryan D. Liesner LeezSoft Communications, Inc. = = A subsidiary of LeezSoft Inc. = = bryan@gravy.homeunix.net Home of the Gipper = =============================================================