From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 25 16:47:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7947C1065684 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:47:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 326998FC12 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:47:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D672082; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:47:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DAF7A844B0; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:47:44 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Pieter de Goeje References: <20080822184231.9ECD873039@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20080822200531.GA37157@keltia.freenix.fr> <200808222247.00575.pieter@degoeje.nl> Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:47:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: <200808222247.00575.pieter@degoeje.nl> (Pieter de Goeje's message of "Fri, 22 Aug 2008 22:47:00 +0200") Message-ID: <86k5e52g9b.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:47:46 -0000 Pieter de Goeje writes: > Hm would it be possible to rate limit tinderbox emails to say 1 every 15= =20 > minutes? This was quite a bunch of email :-|. Reporting the same error ov= er=20 > and over again doesn't seem very useful to me. It was already rate-limited (though more by accident than by intention) to once per target every five minutes. I've increased the interval to twenty minutes. Reporting the same error over and over again is intentional - the reason why the tinderbox was introduced in the first place is that people routinely failed to test their commits, and there were times when CURRENT was unbuildable for days on end. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no