Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 03:12:10 -0800 (PST) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: smp@FreeBSD.ORG, scottl@FreeBSD.ORG, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, Patrick Gardella <patrick@FreeBSD.ORG>, Chris Faulhaber <jedgar@fxp.org> Subject: Re: P5 vs. SMP, part 2 Message-ID: <XFMail.020108031210.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <3C3A7D7B.AB4E0A92@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08-Jan-02 Terry Lambert wrote: > Chris Faulhaber wrote: >> > > > I wonder how many dual P5's are still being used :/ >> > > There's at least you, Gunnar, Me, and (if he finds the parts), >> > > Peter. >> > I use a dual P5 (200) as my primary home development system. Besides >> > the MB, its very easy to find parts for. >> >> I assume, as we move farther off topic, that you guys haven't >> seen any significant slowdowns with your dual P5's with 4.x >> after mid-June? > > I haven't loaded a -current that recently; it's not stable enough > to do real work, unfortunately. > > I can load it, if I can get to Fry's for another disk to burn; > I rather expect to see it be slower... -stable, not -current. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.020108031210.jhb>