Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 02:30:29 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: fbsd <fbsd@typhoon.co.jp> Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is 2.2.8 affected? FreeBSD-SA-01:08.ipfw [REVISED] Message-ID: <20010308023029.A74860@mollari.cthul.hu> In-Reply-To: <3A8BD1C5.FDBEBDC0@typhoon.co.jp>; from fbsd@typhoon.co.jp on Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 09:55:33PM %2B0900 References: <3A8BD1C5.FDBEBDC0@typhoon.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 09:55:33PM +0900, fbsd wrote: >=20 > I apologize if this has been asked recently... >=20 > Is FreeBSD 2.2.X affected by the problems outlined in the above > mentioned > advisory? If so, I'ld have to schedule upgrades for a number of > machines:( I can't remember, but I think so. It's certainly vulnerable to any number of other remote vulnerabilities and hasn't been supported for security fixes for a number of years. Kris --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6p19FWry0BWjoQKURAjusAKDWo4iQPvGZXAdOvMipDc3uAHJxmACgriKp VYJA9lj5YIbprpKJQbqtQII= =fWiX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010308023029.A74860>