From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 22:20:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1468116A41F for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 22:20:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7179443D49 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 22:20:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from [84.163.204.14] (helo=donor.laier.local) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu3) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKxQS-1EcVdM2QVv-0002MI; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 23:20:05 +0100 From: Max Laier To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 23:19:47 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <437BB031.9090504@seton.org> In-Reply-To: <437BB031.9090504@seton.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart8147444.O8u2PtQztv"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200511162319.58857.max@love2party.net> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:61c499deaeeba3ba5be80f48ecc83056 Cc: Matthew Grooms Subject: Re: Traffic Shaping with pf ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 22:20:08 -0000 --nextPart8147444.O8u2PtQztv Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 16 November 2005 23:18, Matthew Grooms wrote: > I have a couple of firewalls running freebsd 5.4 and pf and was > planning to use ALTQ for traffic shaping. But after doing a bit of > reading, it would seem that ALTQ only works on traffic passing outbound > on an interface. Since most of the traffic passing through my firewall > is http and ftp traffic, the inbound direction is the path being > saturated. Did I read the ALTQ documentation wrong or is there another > mechanism available for use with pf that could help me prioritize > bandwidth usage? You can not control inbound traffic! You can not control what other people= =20 sent to you! It's impossible. The only way to do it is to limit *outbound= *=20 traffic on an upstream router. =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart8147444.O8u2PtQztv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDe7COXyyEoT62BG0RApMOAJ92eDkfxCtlrIn8TOdG2kzwLEpHDgCfV93C OJsmnUGbbCXGxLAa6NzGlU4= =3jqU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart8147444.O8u2PtQztv--