Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 15 Mar 2012 10:29:28 -0700
From:      YongHyeon PYUN <pyunyh@gmail.com>
To:        Jan Winter <jan.winter@kantarmedia.de>
Cc:        stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: bce: Device not configured
Message-ID:  <20120315172928.GB3295@michelle.cdnetworks.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F60AC6C.2060805@kantarmedia.de>
References:  <4F5F46DE.5050608@kantarmedia.de> <20120314184047.GA8023@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <4F60AC6C.2060805@kantarmedia.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 03:34:20PM +0100, Jan Winter wrote:
> On 03/14/12 19:40, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 02:08:46PM +0100, Jan Winter wrote:
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >>on an Dell Blade m610 is not possible to change the network media option:
> >>
> >>ifconfig bce0 media 100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex up
> >>ifconfig: SIOCSIFMEDIA (media): Device not configured
> >>
> >>Setting the media option to "autoselect" and connecting the m610 to a
> >>100 MBit switch, I always get "no carrier"
> >>only 1g full-duplex seems to be working. I have tested this on
> >>8.3-prerelease and 9-stable
> >>
> >>any Ideas?
> >>
> >>cheers
> >>Jan
> >>
> >>pciconf -lv
> >>bce0@pci0:1:0:0:        class=0x020000 card=0x02871028 chip=0x163a14e4
> >>rev=0x20 hdr=0x00
> >>     vendor     = 'Broadcom Corporation'
> >>     device     = 'NetXtreme II BCM5709S Gigabit Ethernet'
> >>     class      = network
> >>     subclass   = ethernet
> >>
> >>dmesg
> >>bce0:<Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5709 1000Base-SX (C0)>  mem
> >>0xda000000-0xdbffffff irq 36 at device 0.0 on pci1
> >>miibus0:<MII bus>  on bce0
> >>brgphy0:<BCM5709S 1000/2500baseSX PHY>  PHY 2 on miibus0
> >>brgphy0:  1000baseSX-FDX, auto
> >>bce0: Ethernet address: 00:26:b9:fb:04:0c
> >>bce0: ASIC (0x57092000); Rev (C0); Bus (PCIe x4, 2.5Gbps); B/C (5.0.11);
> >>Bufs (RX:2;TX:2;PG:8); Flags (SPLT|MSI|MFW); MFW (NCSI 2.0.5)
> >>Coal (RX:6,6,18,18; TX:20,20,80,80)
> >>bce1:<Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5709 1000Base-SX (C0)>  mem
> >>0xdc000000-0xddffffff irq 48 at device 0.1 on pci1
> >>miibus1:<MII bus>  on bce1
> >>brgphy1:<BCM5709S 1000/2500baseSX PHY>  PHY 2 on miibus1
> >>brgphy1:  1000baseSX-FDX, auto
> >>bce1: Ethernet address: 00:26:b9:fb:04:0e
> >>bce1: ASIC (0x57092000); Rev (C0); Bus (PCIe x4, 2.5Gbps); B/C (5.0.11);
> >>Bufs (RX:2;TX:2;PG:8); Flags (SPLT|MSI|MFW); MFW (NCSI 2.0.5)
> >>Coal (RX:6,6,18,18; TX:20,20,80,80)
> >>
> >I'm not sure you're seeing one of long standing remote PHY issue of
> >blade box but would you try the patch at the following URL?
> >http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/bce/bce.rphy.diff
> >
> >After applying the patch, show me the dmesg output(bce(4) and
> >brgphy(4) related ones) and 'ifconfig -m bce0'.
> >Note, the patch was not tested at all(lack of hardware).
> 
> Hello,
> 
> thank you very much, for your quick support
> Now its looking much better
> 
> ifconfig -m bce0
> bce0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
>         
> options=c01bb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,VLAN_HWTSO,LINKSTATE>
>         
> capabilities=c01bb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,VLAN_HWTSO,LINKSTATE>
>         ether 00:26:b9:fb:04:0c
>         inet 192.168.100.30 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.100.255
>         inet6 fe80::226:b9ff:fefb:40c%bce0 prefixlen 64 tentative 
> scopeid 0x1
>         nd6 options=29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
>         media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
>         status: active
>         supported media:
>                 media autoselect
>                 media 1000baseT mediaopt full-duplex
>                 media 1000baseT
>                 media 100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex
>                 media 100baseTX
>                 media 10baseT/UTP mediaopt full-duplex
>                 media 10baseT/UTP
> 
> dmesg:
> .....
> bce0: <Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5709 1000Base-SX (C0)> mem 
> 0xda000000-0xdbffffff irq 36 at device 0.0 on pci1
> bce0: attempting to allocate 1 MSI vectors (16 supported)
> msi: routing MSI IRQ 256 to local APIC 16 vector 52
> bce0: using IRQ 256 for MSI
> bce0: Remote PHY : TP
> bce0: bpf attached
> bce0: Ethernet address: 00:26:b9:fb:04:0c
> bce0: ASIC (0x57092000); Rev (C0); Bus (PCIe x4, 2.5Gbps); B/C (5.0.11); 
> Bufs (RX:2;TX:2;PG:8); Flags (SPLT|MSI|Remote PHY(TP)|MFW); MFW (NCSI 2.0.5)
> Coal (RX:6,6,18,18; TX:20,20,80,80)
> bce1: <Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5709 1000Base-SX (C0)> mem 
> 0xdc000000-0xddffffff irq 48 at device 0.1 on pci1
> bce1: attempting to allocate 1 MSI vectors (16 supported)
> msi: routing MSI IRQ 257 to local APIC 16 vector 53
> bce1: using IRQ 257 for MSI
> bce1: Remote PHY : TP
> bce1: bpf attached
> bce1: Ethernet address: 00:26:b9:fb:04:0e
> bce1: ASIC (0x57092000); Rev (C0); Bus (PCIe x4, 2.5Gbps); B/C (5.0.11); 
> Bufs (RX:2;TX:2;PG:8); Flags (SPLT|MSI|Remote PHY(TP)|MFW); MFW (NCSI 2.0.5)
> Coal (RX:6,6,18,18; TX:20,20,80,80)
> .....
> 
> I have done a quick test with 100 and 1000 MBit, both working very well.

Thanks a lot for testing.  This patch was made long time ago but I
haven't had chance to commit it due to lack of access to hardware.
Because the patch bypasses mii(4) layer and makes it hard to read
code, I didn't like the patch but it seems the patch makes bce(4)
usable on blade boxes at least.
I'll commit the patch next week.

> Its possible to get a Patch for 8 Stable?
> 

I will do MFC to stable/[7-9]. And bce.rphy.diff should be applied
cleanly to stable/[7-9].

> 
> thank in advance
> Jan
> 
> 
> 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120315172928.GB3295>