From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 13:56:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E8C116A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:56:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from mail.localelinks.com (web.localelinks.com [64.39.75.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D4043D46 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:56:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (adsl-072-148-013-213.sip.jan.bellsouth.net [72.148.13.213]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.localelinks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CC99168; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:56:27 -0600 (CST) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 5546D61C21; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:56:26 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:56:26 -0600 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Danial Thom Message-ID: <20060111135626.GG98918@over-yonder.net> References: <20060111133229.GF98918@over-yonder.net> <20060111134814.19609.qmail@web33307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060111134814.19609.qmail@web33307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11-fullermd.2 Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org, ann kok Subject: Re: freebsd router X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:56:28 -0000 On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 05:48:14AM -0800 I heard the voice of Danial Thom, and lo! it spake thus: > > I'd be interested in hearing your reasoning for thinking so. I can walk over to Cisco and buy a router that will push well over a billion packets per second. FreeBSD 4.x can't even come within 3 orders of magnitude of that. > Routing is fastest when implemented as a single process task. Not even remotely true. And routing is CERTAINLY not fastest when implemented on a CPU. > While it could be possible to have a faster routing subsystem on a > custom-designed MP O/S, its not practical to build a general purpose > O/S in such a way. s/could be/absolutely is/ Which pretty well eliminates the statement "FreeBSD foo is the fastest router platform Man has ever created" right there. The fastest router platform is and will always be a platform designed to be a router. -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.