From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 21 13:30:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340D816A46E; Mon, 21 May 2007 13:30:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4AB913C48C; Mon, 21 May 2007 13:30:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id A63212084; Mon, 21 May 2007 15:30:32 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on tim.des.no Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 978962083; Mon, 21 May 2007 15:30:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7D03C5752; Mon, 21 May 2007 15:30:32 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Florent Thoumie References: <200705211021.l4LALdGa025468@repoman.freebsd.org> <86k5v2tnhv.fsf@dwp.des.no> <4651884F.3080207@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 15:30:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4651884F.3080207@FreeBSD.org> (Florent Thoumie's message of "Mon\, 21 May 2007 12\:53\:51 +0100") Message-ID: <867ir2tibr.fsf@dwp.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.port.mk X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:30:37 -0000 Florent Thoumie writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wrote: > > Florent Thoumie writes: > > > Log: > > > Fix USE_XLIB to depend on stub file rather than libX11. > > Is this intended as a permanent solution? I realize that having > > USE_XLIB the way it is allows us to support both X.org and XFree86, but > > I would much prefer to see USE_XLIB replaced with something similar to > > USE_XORG, explicitly listing the required libraries. > No this is not permanent. Once we removed XFree86-4, we'll start > removing USE_XLIB in favor of USE_XORG. OK, I didn't realize we were going to remove XFree86 altogether (for the record, I'm in favor) Extending the USE_XLIB syntax would still be useful, as it would allow maintainers to start migrating to the new syntax while remaining compatible with XFree86-4, but it's not a big deal. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no