From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Jan 19 09:44:27 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D5814A0494 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 09:44:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.not-for.work (onlyone.not-for.work [IPv6:2a01:4f8:201:6350::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4485F709E9 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 09:44:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:923f:1:1539:1ac0:163a:36a4]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.not-for.work (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A305F8DE8; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 12:44:23 +0300 (MSK) Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2019 12:44:23 +0300 From: Lev Serebryakov Reply-To: Lev Serebryakov Organization: FreeBSD Message-ID: <1205421423.20190119124423@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: Tomoaki AOKI , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GPT boot has less features than legacy MBR-based one (Was: UEFI, loader.efi and /boot.config) In-Reply-To: <20190119104221.406e7a7b71394a12c80e4e04@dec.sakura.ne.jp> References: <8DDD8F7A-40CA-48BB-9F71-56733100AFE0@me.com> <1a19320b-2211-129c-b213-96601814e0d0@FreeBSD.org> <1f45099e-6a37-3edb-6bd4-f92eb2c4fde8@FreeBSD.org> <20190119104221.406e7a7b71394a12c80e4e04@dec.sakura.ne.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4485F709E9 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.98 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.981,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2019 09:44:27 -0000 Hello Tomoaki, Saturday, January 19, 2019, 4:42:21 AM, you wrote: > I should note that 512-bytes boot0 doesn't have that feature. > What had it WAS larger boot0ext, which has already gone on stable/11 > and later. IIRC, sysinstall let me select which to install on MBR. It has, look at src/stand/i386/boot0/boot0.S It works :-) -- Best regards, Lev mailto:lev@FreeBSD.org