From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 6 17:44:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B44516A400 for ; Sun, 6 May 2007 17:44:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589A713C447 for ; Sun, 6 May 2007 17:44:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix, from userid 58) id 3C093C2F6; Sun, 6 May 2007 13:16:29 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on zoraida.natserv.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME autolearn=disabled version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Report: * 0.0 DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME Domain Keys: policy says domain signs some mails * -1.4 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (zoraida.natserv.net [66.114.65.147]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9621C2E6; Sun, 6 May 2007 13:16:26 -0400 (EDT) References: <200704081823.l38INlcJ030045@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> Message-ID: X-Mailer: http://www.courier-mta.org/cone/ From: Francisco Reyes To: Tuc at =?ISO-8859-1?Q?T-B-O-H=2ENET?= Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 13:16:26 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: All I want is a decent server! X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 17:44:24 -0000 Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET writes: > IXSystems Most configurations are over 2K /FreeBSDSystems They seem even more expensive than ixsystems. >Silicon Mechanics They are good and we once used them, but ixsystems has worked better for us since they are more familiar with FreeBSD. We also had some problems once with Silicon Mechanics and it took too long to solve the problem. Ultimately we sent the machine back and the replacement worked well, but it took too long to diagnose the problem for them to send us a replacement server.