From owner-freebsd-current Fri Apr 23 11:23:34 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from kithrup.com (kithrup.com [205.179.156.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0947714EAD for ; Fri, 23 Apr 1999 11:23:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sef@kithrup.com) Received: (from sef@localhost) by kithrup.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA15437; Fri, 23 Apr 1999 11:21:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sef) Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 11:21:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Sean Eric Fagan Message-Id: <199904231821.LAA15437@kithrup.com> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nice little kernel task for somebody In-Reply-To: <19990423091633.14103.qmail.kithrup.freebsd.current@ewok.creative.net.au> References: Your message of "Thu, 22 Apr 1999 17:32:40 +0100." <9904221732.aa19138@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Organization: Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd. Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >> Here's a thing I've missed a couple of times: I'd like to be >> able to see the limits for a process in /proc. At some point, I want to add an ioctl to get various process information (well, multiple ioctl's, I think); SysVr4 has a bunch, and that's what I'd model it on. >I'd like to be able to open processes file discriptors too (so >you can still get files back if all the filsystem references to >it have gone, but a process still has it open). I might have a >go at doing both - if it isn't too Linuxesque. Ugh. I don't particularly like that one. It's fairly rare, and very invasive, and gives me the willies. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message