From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Aug 25 13:29:57 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA07710 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 25 Aug 1997 13:29:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from luke.cpl.net (luke.cpl.net [207.67.172.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA07693 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 1997 13:29:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (shawn@localhost) by luke.cpl.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA02166; Mon, 25 Aug 1997 13:29:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 1997 13:29:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Shawn Ramsey To: chaos@tgci.com cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Excite using BSDI or Linux emulation In-Reply-To: <199708251917.MAA11361@train.tgci.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > One of my users d/l'ed the BSDI version of Excite. Do I need to do > anything special to use the BSDI version of Excite on fbsd 2.2.2-R? > Should I use Linux emulation instead? Any pros or cons for bsdi vs > linux? > > I know how to enable Linux emulation, but a (very) quick look > at the docs didn't turn up anything on bsdi emulation. Do I need to > build a new kernel for bsdi? Nothing special needs to be done for BSDI emulation, and all the BSD's are somewhat compatible with each other. I know BSDI can run at least some FreeBSD binaries, and FreeBSD can run NetBSD binaries, and probably OpenBSD as well.