From owner-freebsd-current Thu Sep 14 12:42:55 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from pike.osd.bsdi.com (pike.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.28.222]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5496F37B424 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 12:42:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jhb@localhost) by pike.osd.bsdi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA86101; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 12:41:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jhb) From: John Baldwin Message-Id: <200009141941.MAA86101@pike.osd.bsdi.com> Subject: Re: SMPNG kernel on UP In-Reply-To: <200009141932.NAA98362@harmony.village.org> from Warner Losh at "Sep 14, 2000 01:32:25 pm" To: Warner Losh Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 12:41:51 -0700 (PDT) Cc: Mark Murray , current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL68 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Warner Losh wrote: > In message <200009141928.MAA85518@pike.osd.bsdi.com> John Baldwin writes: > : It may be a kernel/world sync problem. Although I don't know why the ioctl > : argument would suddenly become invalid. Maybe it passes in a struct ucred, > : which changed in size just before the SMPng commit? > > I don't know either. However, it might be because of permission > problems. It will return EINVAL when it can't open the apm file for > write. Maybe a devfs related issue? Hmm, it may not be using the right perms during make_dev perhaps. > Warner -- John Baldwin -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message