Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 21:29:10 -0500 From: Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> To: Pete Fritchman <petef@databits.net> Cc: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>, jake@locore.ca, sparc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libtool port? Message-ID: <20020404022910.GA92854@electricjellyfish.net> In-Reply-To: <20020402003513.A87020@databits.net> References: <20020331143437.A62183@databits.net> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0204011745580.768-100000@ernie.eit.uni-kl.de> <20020401230551.O207@locore.ca> <200204020514.g325EFo63508@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20020402003513.A87020@databits.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 12:35:13AM -0500, Pete Fritchman wrote: > ++ 02/04/02 00:14 -0500 - Garrett Wollman: > | In article <20020401230551.O207@locore.ca> you write: > | > | >> Yes, there should be two quotes. > | >> It it definitely the parsing of "s by /bin/sh. > | > > | >Anyone care to investigate further? > | > | I'd say ``check your binary checksums'' first. > | > | libf^Htool built just fine on my U5, as I've noted here before, and > | came close enough to passing its regression tests. > > I built /bin/sh from the latest p4 sources and no-go here for me. You > don't have any local patches at all? Could you maybe send me your > /bin/sh binary? has anyone made any progress on this problem? i've got the same results, and rebuilding sh didn't seem to change anything. -garrett -- garrett rooney Remember, any design flaw you're rooneg@electricjellyfish.net sufficiently snide about becomes http://electricjellyfish.net/ a feature. -- Dan Sugalski To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020404022910.GA92854>