Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:22:10 +1000 From: Sam Lawrance <boris@brooknet.com.au> To: Stephen Hurd <shurd@sasktel.net> Cc: ports <ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Clarification on fetch/extract targets Message-ID: <076C3370-474B-4161-8341-0C66AED2ACDB@brooknet.com.au> In-Reply-To: <4677563C.7090909@sasktel.net> References: <4673B0DB.3040100@sasktel.net> <A067E197-1540-43E6-B396-7F08179C0CA2@brooknet.com.au> <46742CF6.3050901@sasktel.net> <20070616202819.GA29331@rot13.obsecurity.org> <4674572D.9060707@sasktel.net> <8623CF89-858D-4524-9B4A-9147913739F3@brooknet.com.au> <46765049.3080605@sasktel.net> <4B85C7D6-E5C1-450C-B2B2-8D130C1B909F@brooknet.com.au> <4677563C.7090909@sasktel.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 19/06/2007, at 2:06 PM, Stephen Hurd wrote: > Sam Lawrance wrote: >> Maybe I don't understand what you're trying to do. What's the >> point of bumping PORTREVISION? >> >> For that matter, what's the point of WITH_SVN given what you've >> just said? > > PORTREVISION == SVN Revision OK, it makes sense to me now that you explained that.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?076C3370-474B-4161-8341-0C66AED2ACDB>