From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 3 13:37:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CE591065672; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:37:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ehaupt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx.critical.ch (cl-8.zrh-02.ch.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:1620:f00:7::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D579C8FC1B; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:37:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wiggles.bwns.ch (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.critical.ch (8.14.4/8.14.4/tits or GTFO!!!1!!) with SMTP id p73DbSBW069997; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 15:37:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ehaupt@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 15:37:28 +0200 From: Emanuel Haupt To: Warren Block Message-Id: <20110803153728.dc65cccd.ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: References: <6483ddd2504ceeb023f1e4774b495f72@etoilebsd.net> <4e390eaf.5MJ3G9ielo7JZhvs%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <9807aab2a5e2effdaa359cc38f926a8b@etoilebsd.net> <4e39555b.aXrOnSmaaWrsvmPB%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <18c8dc0c9814ccdf7479e97a2727b12f@etoilebsd.net> <20110803103005.02ffa8fe.ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Baptiste, perryh@pluto.rain.com, Daroussin , Emanuel Haupt Subject: Re: Deprecation: round3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 13:37:30 -0000 Warren Block wrote: > On Wed, 3 Aug 2011, Emanuel Haupt wrote: > > > I have to admit that 'distilator' definitely needs more public > > relations work and way more explanatory text. > > > > I wouldn't mind altering, amending the text but I could use some > > help. > > "Distfile status for..." at the top of the report page is a little > vague. "Distfile availability status" or "Distfile fetch status" > would help describe what was being tested. I've implemented both your suggestions. It will be visible after the next run. Thanks a lot for your feedback! Emanuel