From owner-freebsd-advocacy Wed Sep 22 21:46:44 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mcp.csh.rit.edu (mcp.csh.rit.edu [129.21.60.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D751517A for ; Wed, 22 Sep 1999 21:46:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from markd@csh.rit.edu) Received: from gibson.csh.rit.edu (IDENT:markd@gibson.csh.rit.edu [129.21.60.15]) by mcp.csh.rit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA14075 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 1999 00:49:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Mark Dunham Received: (from markd@localhost) by gibson.csh.rit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA28441 for advocacy@freebsd.org; Thu, 23 Sep 1999 00:46:58 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 00:46:58 -0400 To: advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: *BSD or FreeBSD user groups Message-ID: <19990923004657.B24729@csh.rit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/0.96.3i X-Operating-System: OSF1 alpha Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG My fellow advocates, Myself and some friends are planning on starting a users group in our area. ( Rochester, NY for those interested. ) We are still debating whether to make it a FreeBSD users group, or a general BSD users group. I'm wondering if having a *BSD group will result in a users group less focused and hence less capable of addressing members needs and such. Does anyone out there have experience on the FreeBSD vs. *BSD users group issue? Any thoughts are welcome. Mark To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message